Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition 2019

Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition 2019 Life in the Future

Theme Life in the Future

What will the future look like? How can architects design dwellings to meet evolving living patterns and the challenges of the future? This competition offers the contestant the opportunity to answer these questions. The contestant will be asked to design dwellings that take a bold social and environmentally sustainable view of the future.
70 years ago, New Canaan’s Mid Century architects faced similar questions. To these architects who practiced during that period, Mid-Century Modern was more than a style. It was a social, and even a political movement. They believed that the architecture they practiced offered new ideas for living that were more advanced and better suited for the times than the architecture that preceded them. By creating more efficient and scientific households, they thought of houses as “Machines for Living,” a term that became popular at the time. (a+u 19:05)
Now, more than 70 years later, it is time to re-examine the criteria on which the success of housing is formed, both from a programming, architectural and urbanistic point of view. In order to look to the future, one must not only understand the successes and failures of the past, but also be able to gauge what are some of the urgencies of the present.

Alan Goldberg

Note: There is an additional announcement about submission requirements from Alan Goldberg, the professional advisor.
1. Write a 300 word essay in English, or 600 characters in Japanese, which must be in 12 point type or larger, describing the physical and social challenges that will be faced by people living in the future, and how you would address these challenges.
2. The judging criteria will be based on how successfully the applicants' submission meet the challenges they identify.
 a. Efficient use of land
 b. Use of latest building technologies
 c. Lowering resource consumption
 d. Affordability
 e. Social benefits

Prize

  • WinnerMultiple1,000,000¥

The number of winners and the amount of prize will be determined by the judges.

Schedule

  • 2019.05.01 (水)Registration opens
  • 2019.09.30 (月)Registration closed
  • 2019.01.01 (火)Announcement of the Winner

Guidelines

  • Entry and Application

    To enter the competition, please first register on the competition website. A registration number will be issued by email after the registration form is properly completed. Each applicant should keep a record of this registration number, as it will be needed for submitting your proposal. If there is any change in the registered personal information, re-registration is required. Also, if the applicant wishes to submit multiple proposals, it is necessary to obtain a registration number for each proposal.
    • No inquiries regarding the registration number will be accepted once the number has been issued.
    • Registration is only available through the competition website.
    • Use of mobile phone email address is not recommended since there might be problems in receiving the registration number.

  • Submission Requirements

    Contents: Site plan, floor plan, elevation, section, perspective drawing and axonometric drawing at any scale. You are free to include photograph of a model, detailed drawing, other chart. Your submission should include a descriptive text of your design in less than 250 words in English, which must be in 12 point type or larger. Paste this same text in your submission email. All drawings, illustrations, and texts should be laid out on two sheets of A2 (420×594 mm / 16.5×23.5 inches).
    • File format: PDF
    • File size should not exceed 10 MB (please combine two sheets in one file)
    • The registration number must be used as the name of the PDF file of each design entry (e.g., skc0000.pdf).

  • Submission Procedure

    Use your pre-registered email address and adhere to the format described below.
    1) Email subject line should read: “0000 (your registration number) / Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition 2019”.
    2) Attach your submission file. Be mindful of the file size. Files that do not meet the specified requirements will not be considered.
    3) Your email should include the following information: the registration number / full name, age, and profession of all the team members / team leader’s home address, telephone number, fax number (if available), and email address / a descriptive text of the design in less than 250 words.
    Note: The amount of emails right before the deadline may overwhelm our internet server, so please do not wait until the last minute to submit your entry. The competition hosts will take no responsibility for submissions that arrive late due to technical issues and will not judge such submissions.

  • Announcement of the Winner

    Winner(s) will be announced in the 2020 January issue of SHINKENCHIKU (published on Jan 1, 2019) and a+u (published on Dec 27, 2019) magazines, their digital issues and on the competition website.

  • Notice

    • Copyright of the proposal belongs to the applicant, while the publishing right belongs to Shinkenchiku-sha Co., Ltd..
    • Submitted proposals, regardless of the result, may be published on the competition website.
    • Questions regarding the competition regulations will not be answered by the hosts. All matters not covered in the regulations listed above are left to the discretion of the entrants.
    • Proposals must not have been made public previously in any form. The work must not (in total or in part) infringe on anybody’s copyrights. Do not use images copied from magazines, books, or websites. If a copyright infringement is discovered, the prize may be taken back at the host’s discretion.
    • The winning entrants will be requested to submit high-resolution digital data for publication.
    • All fees associated with submissions must be borne by entrants.
    • Please double-check the contents of your submission. You will not be allowed to replace your proposal after submission.
    • Please avoid corrupted texts and broken links. Please embed all the linked files.
    • Entries will only be accepted if they adhere to all the regulations.

Judges

  • ナデール・テラーニ

    Christoph IngenhovengJury Chair

    Dean of the Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture at The Cooper Union and Principal at NADAAA, a practice dedicated to the advancement of design innovation, interdisciplinary collaboration, and an intensive dialogue with the construction industry. His work has been recognized with notable international awards in architecture. Photo by Leo Sorel, courtesy The Cooper Union.

  • マーク・リー

    Mark LeeJury Member

    Founding partners of the architecture firm Johnston Marklee & Associates, and Chairman of Department of Architecture at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University. He was the co-curator of the 2017 Chicago Architecture Biennial ‘Make New History’.

  • リサ・イワモト

    Lisa IwamotoJury Member

    Founding Partner of IwamotoScott Architecture which she leads with her partner Craig Scott. Lisa received her Master of Architecture degree with Distinction from Harvard University, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Structural Engineering from the University of Colorado. She is a Professor at the University of California Berkeley.

  • バーバラ・ベスター

    Barbara BestorJury Member

    Founding principal of Bestor Architecture. Since 1995, She has actively redefined Los Angeles architecture with a practice that engages the city through design, art, and urbanism. She received her undergraduate degree at Harvard University, studied at the Architecture Association in London and received a MARCH at SCI-Arc.

  • クリスティーナ・パレーニョ・アロンソ

    Cristina Parreño AlonsoJury Member

    Licensed architect who specializes in activating public spaces through architecture and art installations. Cristina has taught design studios at the State University of NY at Buffalo and Harvard GSD. She currently teaches graduate and undergraduate design studios at MIT School of Architecture and Planning.

  • アラン・ゴールドバーグ

    Alan GoldbergProfessional Advisor

    Principal architect of AG/ENA. In 1966, he moved to New Canaan, Connecticut to join Eliot Noyes & Associates. Since then, he has designed and managed a number of diverse projects for some of the nation’s leading corporations and public agencies for over 50years.

Comments

Competition 2019 Living in the Future: Jury Report

ナデール・テラーニ

Nader Tehrani Jury Chair

What will the future look like? How can architects design dwellings to meet evolving living patterns and the challenges of the future? These are the questions posed of the seventy-six candidates who submitted to this competition, and indeed, the submissions diverged in both focus and genre. The questions also prompted fundamental challenges to how architects think about the context of the house, whether in its autonomy or the context in which it is grounded, be it urban or rural. The question of the “future” also assured a fair sense of speculation, narrative and projection, imagining not only spaces of a time and place yet to exist, but also the fiction that holds it together.

The jury selected twenty-five projects to discuss as part of a long list, resulting in eight that have been selected for recognition: four with awards, and four with honorable mentions. The winning selection, [195] described as The House for our Mothers was recognized for the strength and clarity of its vision, organization and morphological play. A house almost entirely cast as a “roof”, the figure of an almost perfect pyramid is rendered complex through an interplay of spatial relationships with its interior spaces, offering dormers and scaled openings to the exterior as the spaces of the house ascend to its top. Ambiguously set as a volume, as well as a series of planar aggregations, the roof is rendered at once solid and vulnerable, delicately balancing the two interpretations. Curiously familiar as a figure, the house’s roof projects into the future through defamiliarization, adopting traditional techniques, while making them strange. The project also envisions a dual agenda for the future, the first in the redefinition of the concept of family, and the second in establishing a sustainable set of practices that ties our disciplines to a broader global commitment. Tied in second, two varied genres are brought neck to neck. Contrary to the winning submission, Vil-Link [338] imagines the context of rural China as the site of intervention: instead of a retreat to the rapidly expanding cities, the project imagines a new form of urbanism within which linear growth can contribute to the rural context. If Vil-Link takes on the urgencies of a contemporary China, Nostalgia Utopia [068] builds a narrative out of China’s past and imagined future, recomposed together on an elaborate set of drawings, composed of two radically different modes of representations: one pictorial and the other technical. In tandem, these two offer the discipline of tectonic rigor in tandem with a mythic landscape, recombined with both wit and irony. The third winner targets the middle-scale of collective housing. The Tower with Gaps [102] challenges the extruded complacency of the Hong Kong tower, by introducing a subtle series of gaps between living units of a tower typology. The very spaces offer the environment for collective interaction, share space, social engagement, and a vertical urbanity. Diagrammatic in its brevity, this project also paves the way for the honorable mentions in the next category; the honorable mentions [177, 291, 318, 328] are all bestowed onto exemplary projects that adopt strong graphic languages each of which engages the architectural discipline in different ways: the first through planimetric intervention of canonical house plans, the second through a techno-diagrammatic series of iterations on ‘rooms’, the third through a graphic novel depictions, and the fourth through an abstract allusion to green ecologies. As a body of work these eight projects offer their imagination, piecing together past histories, today’s urgencies, and projections of the future into one representational space.

マーク・リー

Mark Lee Jury Member

[195] House for Our Mothers: This exemplary project adeptly addresses complex issues of changing familial structures in contemporary societies. Utilizing familiar archetypal elements of the ziggurat and pitched roofs, the project paves the way for a new understanding of the relationships between the individualistic and the collectivist, the autonomous and the interconnected – ultimately eliciting an examination of the distribution of resources in future cities.

[318] a Room: Reinterpreting Le Corbusier’s dictum that a house is a “machine for living,” this project hones in on the room – the lowest common denominator and most basic unit in architecture – as a productive point of departure from which to question the future of the discipline. Through a series of mechanisms, from revolving doors to scanners and 3D printers, the project unveils a refreshing new perception of the dynamic potential of adaptive space; one that participates constantly in the process of its own making.

リサ・イワモト

Lisa Iwamoto Jury Member

[102] Tower with Gaps: The jury appreciated the clever and edited approach to rethinking the Hong Kong tower. The slight shift in massing creating new shared space and dramatically shifts the perception of the multi-family tower.

[177] In My Father’s House There Are Many Mansions: This project showed a rigor to the plan investigations matched by compelling graphics. While the jury felt the residential scale was more successful than the urban iterations, both suggest great inventiveness using minimal means.

バーバラ・ベスター

Barbara Bestor Jury Member

[291] Back to the Nature: This clever housing unit, that can be replicated on a large scale, integrates sustainable living with social interaction. A “green oasis” is self-sustaining pushing urban farming to an almost cellular level. The design thoughtfully stacks public and private areas to encourage socialization and community building. Expanded to the neighborhood scale (a Trojan horse in the form of a European housing block) it provides an intriguing model for sustainable growth in cities .

[338] Vil-Link: This forward-thinking proposal moves outside the well trod issue of urbanization in China to explore rural areas as a legitimate site for new development projects. The proposed development of a network of use-links for the reuse of resource silos creates anew link between the rural and the urban. Pushing beyond housing, the design looks at the whole community: linking housing, education, amenities and industrial infrastructure to create a vital connection between rural and urban communities in China.

クリスティーナ・パレーニョ・アロンソ

Cristina Parreño Alonso Jury Member

[068] Nostalgia Utopia,is an interplay between past and future. The idea of nostalgia is rendered as the home sickness of those evicted from their houses by the construction of the Three Gorges Dam in China, the world’s largest power station; and utopia, as a proposed ideal scenario where speculative new technological advances, would bring those people back home through a futuristic city built on water. The project is able to combine high degree of speculation with the rigors of the technical drawing, a rich fictional narrative with a strong representation.

[328] My Home Plan proposes a fictional future in which the home is presented as a human appendix. A 2.4x2.4 m2 space, mobile and versatile, accompanies the person from birth to death becoming a compressed cinerary casket when the owner passes away. The project was selected as an honorable mention for the bravery of its radical speculation paired with a strong pictorial narration. A project of science fiction in which the way the house is conceived fundamentally transforms the lifestyle of the future.

Registration Closed2019.05 – 2019.09